Say Toucan
A simple feedback board where customers post ideas and vote, built as a cheaper alternative after the maker's own feedback tool tripled its price.
🔗 Visit Say Toucan
Description
If you run any kind of product, you eventually need a place for customers to suggest features and vote on what matters most — instead of that feedback getting lost in emails, Slack DMs, or support tickets. A feedback board is a public (or private) page where users post ideas, upvote others', and see what's planned, in progress, or shipped, so a small team can prioritize by actual demand instead of guesswork or whoever complained loudest.
Say Toucan is a straightforward entry in that category, built directly out of frustration: its maker was using an established feedback board tool that tripled its subscription price, and built a simpler replacement rather than pay the increase. It covers the core mechanics of the category — a public board for submissions, voting, and status tracking — without the extra layers (roadmaps, changelogs, integrations) that push incumbents like Canny into higher pricing tiers. Pricing isn't published on the site as of this review, which is worth confirming directly before committing if you need budget certainty.
💬 Our review
The short version: Say Toucan exists because a well-known feedback tool got expensive, and its whole pitch is being the plainer, cheaper alternative — there's no evidence here of a differentiated feature set beyond the basics.
Against Canny, Upvoty, or Frill, which have built out roadmaps, custom domains, SSO, and changelog automation over years, Say Toucan reads as a lean, single-purpose board: post, vote, track status. That's a legitimate niche — plenty of small teams pay for features they never use in the bigger platforms — but it also means less to evaluate before switching, and less protection if the product stalls (indie tools built to solve one founder's own pricing gripe don't always get maintained long-term). Worth a look if you just need a bare-bones feedback board and want to avoid a $50+/month incumbent; skip it if you need roadmap pages, public changelogs, or support-desk integrations, where the established players still have a real edge.
💰 Pricing
📊 Global score
🤖 AI-enriched data
Tarification non publiée sur le site au moment de la revue
Pros
Positionnement clair : alternative simple et moins chère à Canny
Mécanique de base solide (soumission, vote, statut)
Pas de superflu qui gonfle la facture
Cons
Tarification non publiée, à vérifier directement
Aucune fonctionnalité différenciante documentée (pas de roadmap publique, changelog, SSO)
Outil indé jeune, pérennité incertaine