Latted
AI video tool that turns a single prompt into a finished multi-minute video, or lets you edit raw footage, all on one timeline instead of juggling separate generation and editing apps.
🔗 Visit Latted
Description
If you have ever tried making a marketing or explainer video, you know the usual routine: generate some AI clips in one app, stitch them together in a second app, then fix the audio in a third. Latted's whole idea is to collapse that into one screen — you type what you want, it generates the footage, and you trim, caption, and polish it right there on the same timeline, so a single person can go from an idea to a publishable video without hopping between five browser tabs.
Technically, Latted is a script-to-video pipeline paired with a conventional multi-track timeline editor: you can generate a 10-minute video from a single prompt, or import your own footage and use the AI layer for motion graphics, voice, and asset-consistency across scenes (so the same character or product doesn't visually drift shot to shot). It's YC-backed and built by a two-person founding team, which keeps the product tightly scoped rather than trying to be a full production suite — it's positioned for quick-turnaround marketing clips, demos, and social content rather than cinema-grade output.
💬 Our review
The short version: Latted is a reasonable pick if you want a lightweight, single-screen way to turn a script into a rough-cut video fast, but it's a very young, two-person product competing against far better-funded and more mature AI video tools.
💰 Pricing
📊 Global score
🤖 AI-enriched data
Freemium model with free tier for limited video generation and editing; paid tiers for higher usage, longer videos, and advanced features.
Pros
Generation and editing live on one timeline instead of separate tools
Can produce a full 10-minute video from a single text prompt
Asset-consistency tooling keeps characters/products visually stable across scenes
YC-backed with founder attention on rapid iteration
Aimed squarely at marketing/social clips rather than trying to do everything
Cons
Extremely young company (founded 2024, 2-person team) with a thin track record
Competes directly with far better-funded incumbents like Runway and Descript
Free tier likely capped hard on length/quality/exports
Little independent review coverage to verify output quality claims
Small team means slower response to bugs or feature requests than larger competitors