Requesty

Requesty

A single API endpoint that talks to 600+ AI models from 30+ providers, so switching from one AI model to another — or spreading requests across several for cost or reliability — doesn't mean rewriting your app's code.

🔗 Visit Requesty
📁 AI & Machine Learning🗣️ English📅 July 21, 2026

Description

Every AI provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google and dozens more) has its own API format, so an app that wants to use several models — or switch when a cheaper or better one comes along — normally has to write and maintain separate integration code for each. Requesty removes that friction: it's a single, OpenAI-compatible endpoint that routes a request to whichever of 600+ models across 30+ providers you specify, so switching providers becomes a config change instead of a rewrite.

Requesty is a managed, Rust-built LLM gateway routing requests across 600+ models from 30+ providers including OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, DeepSeek and Mistral through one OpenAI-compatible API. It offers intelligent routing, prompt caching claimed to cut token costs up to 90%, and enterprise governance features (SSO, RBAC, audit logs, model whitelisting). Pricing is straightforward: a Free tier (200 requests/day, free models only), Pay-As-You-Go (a flat 5% markup on underlying model costs, no subscription or seat fees, $10 free credit on signup), and custom Enterprise pricing with SOC2/GDPR/HIPAA compliance and EU data residency.

💬 Our review

The short version: Requesty's core value is straightforward and genuinely useful — one integration instead of 30+ separate provider integrations — and its flat 5% markup pricing model is easier to reason about than gateways with more convoluted fee structures.

The honest gap is competitive crowding: this is a busy category with OpenRouter and Portkey both already established (and both already covered elsewhere in this catalog), so Requesty's differentiation comes down to specifics — its claimed 90% cost reduction via prompt caching and its enterprise governance features (SSO, RBAC, audit logs) aimed at larger teams that need compliance guardrails around multi-provider LLM usage. Its usage stats (70,000+ developers, 90B+ tokens/day) are self-reported without independent verification, so treat them as directional. For teams that specifically need enterprise governance controls around multi-model routing — audit logs, model whitelisting, EU data residency — Requesty's enterprise tier is a reasonable pick; for a simpler, more community-driven routing layer, OpenRouter's broader ecosystem and marketplace-style model listing may already do the job.

💰 Pricing

FreemiumFree (200 req/jour, modèles gratuits). Pay-As-You-Go : markup 5%. Enterprise sur devis.
Free 0Pay-As-You-Go Enterprise

📊 Global score

58Average
🌐Availability15/100Faible

1 language · 0 platform

📄Profile100/100Excellent

Profile completeness

🤖 AI-enriched data

💰 Pricing model
🆓 Freemium

Free : 200 requêtes/jour, modèles gratuits uniquement. Pay-As-You-Go : markup fixe de 5% sur le coût des modèles, pas d'abonnement, $10 de crédit gratuit à l'inscription. Enterprise : sur devis (SSO, RBAC, audit logs, résidence des données UE).

👥 Target audienceÉquipes voulant router leurs requêtes IA vers plusieurs fournisseurs via une seule intégration, avec gouvernance enterprise en option
🗣️ Languagesen
🌍 Target countriesMonde
👍

Pros

Un seul endpoint compatible OpenAI pour 600+ modèles sur 30+ fournisseurs

Markup fixe de 5%, facile à raisonner par rapport à d'autres structures de frais

Gouvernance enterprise (SSO, RBAC, audit logs, résidence UE) pour les grandes équipes

👎

Cons

Catégorie très concurrentielle (OpenRouter, Portkey déjà bien établis)

Statistiques d'usage auto-rapportées, non vérifiées indépendamment

Pas de trace GitHub publique pour juger de la traction communautaire

❓ Frequently asked questions

What is Requesty used for?
How is Requesty priced?
What enterprise features does Requesty offer?
How does Requesty reduce costs?
Is it worth the money compared to alternatives?
Which tool should you pick for your case?