Clawdeck
An unofficial, zero-dependency local dashboard for Claude Code that shows sessions, cost burn rate, git worktrees, CI status and MCP server analytics in one place.
🔗 Visit Clawdeck
Description
If you use Claude Code for real work, you eventually want to know things like how much a session is costing you and whether your CI is still green, without switching between five different tabs. Clawdeck is a tiny local dashboard, running only on your own machine, that puts all of that in one place.
Clawdeck is a zero-dependency Node.js (stdlib-only server, browser-native ES modules client) local dashboard for Claude Code. It tracks sessions and event timelines, forecasts cost burn rate, manages git worktrees with line-anchor-aware review comments, reads CI status across GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps and Gitea (read-only), renders a trace waterfall of tool-call spans, and reports MCP server call counts/error rates plus host CPU/memory/disk. It binds to loopback only with DNS-rebinding protection, and is MIT licensed.
💬 Our review
The short version: Clawdeck is the "one glance" dashboard Claude Code doesn't ship with — session cost, CI status, worktrees and MCP health, all local and read-only.
It's unofficial and doesn't integrate with Anthropic's own tooling beyond reading local session data, and being strictly read-only means it can't act on anything it shows you — it's an observation layer, not an automation layer like Jardinero or Ghost Hunter. Its biggest selling point over building your own dashboard is the zero-dependency architecture (nothing to audit, nothing to update) and broad forge support out of the box. Free and worth installing if you use Claude Code daily and want cost/CI visibility without extra tabs; skip it if you need something that can act on CI failures, not just report them.
💰 Pricing
📊 Global score
🤖 AI-enriched data
Open source, licence MIT
Pros
Zéro dépendance externe, surface d'attaque minimale
100% local, aucune donnée de session ne quitte la machine
Support de multiples forges (GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps, Gitea)
Cons
Non officiel, aucun support ni garantie d'Anthropic
Lecture seule, ne peut pas agir sur ce qu'il affiche
Nécessite de configurer des tokens de dépôt pour les intégrations forge