lla.ma Apps

lla.ma Apps

A deployment platform where pushing to your main branch automatically builds, containerizes, and puts your app online with HTTPS already set up.

🔗 Visit lla.ma Apps
📁 DevOps, Cloud & Infrastructure🗣️ English📅 September 5, 2026

Description

Getting a web app from "code on your laptop" to "live on the internet with a real domain and HTTPS" usually involves a checklist most developers know by heart but still find tedious: build the container, set up a certificate, configure environment variables, wire up a domain. lla.ma tries to make that whole checklist happen automatically the moment you push code.

lla.ma is a deployment platform that automates building, containerizing, and deploying applications the moment you push to your main branch, with automatic HTTPS certificate generation and framework auto-detection (Next.js, static sites, or a Dockerfile). It handles environment variables with automatic log scrubbing so secrets don't leak into logs, keeps deploy history with rollback capability, and supports custom domains. Notably, it offers both a paid cloud-hosted option and a free, open-source (Apache 2.0) self-hosted version, without per-seat charges or build-minute metering.

💬 Our review

The short version: lla.ma is a credible Vercel/Netlify-style deploy platform with a real edge for teams that want an escape hatch — an open-source self-hosted version — but its flat, capped pricing tiers may not suit very light or very bursty usage.

Vercel and Netlify are the obvious comparisons, and both are more mature and battle-tested, but neither offers a genuine open-source self-hosted path if you ever want to leave their cloud — lla.ma does, which matters a lot for teams wary of platform lock-in. Railway is closer in spirit (container-first, simpler pricing) but again, no self-hosted option. Framework auto-detection and automatic HTTPS put lla.ma on par with the category leaders on convenience; the real tradeoff is that its tiers (Free/$29/$99) are flat-rate with bandwidth caps, so a spiky side project might either overpay or hit limits awkwardly compared to the more usage-metered pricing some competitors offer. For a team that values an open-source exit ramp, it's a genuinely differentiated pick.

📊 Global score

53Average
🌐Availability15/100Faible

1 language · 0 platform

📄Profile90/100Excellent

Profile completeness

🤖 AI-enriched data

💰 Pricing model
🆓 Freemium

Gratuit (1 projet), Developer 29$/mois (10 projets, 1 To de bande passante), Team 99$/mois (projets illimités, 5 To), Enterprise sur devis.

👥 Target audienceDéveloppeurs et équipes déployant des applications web et sites statiques
🗣️ Languagesen
🌍 Target countriesWorldwide
👍

Pros

Détection automatique du framework (Next.js, sites statiques, Dockerfiles)

Génération automatique de certificats HTTPS

Option cloud hébergé ET open-source auto-hébergée (Apache 2.0)

👎

Cons

Tarification au forfait, peu adaptée aux projets à très faible usage

Plafonds de bande passante sur les paliers inférieurs

❓ Frequently asked questions

What is lla.ma in one sentence?
Does it support Dockerfiles?
Can I self-host it instead of using the cloud version?
Does it handle custom domains?
Is it worth the money compared to alternatives?
Which tool should you pick for your case?