Replace.so
Directory that helps you find self-hosted, open-source replacements for the SaaS subscriptions you're currently paying for
🔗 Visit Replace.so
Description
Every SaaS subscription adds up, and a lot of them have a solid open-source project doing the same job for free if you're willing to run it yourself — the hard part is knowing which project is actually good and actively maintained versus abandoned. Replace.so is built to answer exactly that question: pick a category of tool you're paying for, and see the open-source, self-hostable options ranked by real GitHub activity.
Replace.so is a searchable directory covering 25+ categories of self-hosted, open-source software, with rankings based on GitHub popularity signals (stars, forks) and editorial comparisons meant to help you pick the right replacement rather than just listing everything that exists.
💬 Our review
The short version: if you're trying to cut a SaaS bill by self-hosting, Replace.so is a genuinely useful starting point — it's free, and the GitHub-activity ranking gives you a quick signal for whether a project is actually maintained before you sink a weekend into deploying it.
Compared to AlternativeTo or StackShare, which cover both SaaS and open-source options broadly, Replace.so's focus is narrower and more deliberate — self-hostable open-source only — which makes it more useful specifically for the "I want to stop paying for this" use case rather than general tool discovery. The limitation is coverage: 25+ categories isn't exhaustive of the entire SaaS landscape, and star/fork counts are a decent but imperfect proxy for quality — a well-marketed project can out-rank a better but quieter one. Worth bookmarking as a starting point, not a final verdict on any tool.
📊 Global score
🤖 AI-enriched data
Répertoire gratuit, modèle non-commercial avec newsletter optionnelle.
Pros
Focus exclusif sur les alternatives open-source auto-hébergeables, pas un annuaire généraliste
Classement basé sur l'activité GitHub réelle (stars, forks) plutôt qu'un simple listing
Méthodologie éditoriale avec comparaisons pour aider à choisir, pas juste énumérer
Cons
Couverture limitée à environ 25 catégories, pas exhaustive de tout le paysage SaaS
Le classement par popularité GitHub reste un indicateur imparfait de qualité réelle
Pas de compte utilisateur ni de préférences persistantes