XYZZY

XYZZY

Self-hosted multiplayer AI workspace for technical decision-making with tamper-evident audit trails and governed agent orchestration. Built in Python with persistent event sourcing and real-time WebSocket collaboration.

🔗 Visit XYZZY
📁 AI & Machine Learning🗣️ English📅 August 31, 2026

Description

Picture a team of AI assistants working together on a complex decision — like reviewing a contract or designing a system — and being able to see, later, exactly which piece of evidence led to which conclusion, with nothing quietly lost or altered along the way. XYZZY is built for that: a shared workspace where multiple AI agents collaborate under human oversight, and every step leaves a tamper-evident trail you can audit.

XYZZY is a self-hosted, open-source (Apache 2.0) multiplayer AI workspace written in Python with a FastAPI backend, SQLite by default (optional Redis for multi-process scaling), and real-time WebSocket collaboration. It orchestrates multiple AI agents with human-in-the-loop approval gates, persists a hash-chained event-sourced audit trail, versions artifacts, and links decisions to the underlying evidence through a structured ontology. It supports local models via Ollama or LM Studio as well as the OpenAI API, and ships with 954 passing tests.

💬 Our review

The short version: XYZZY targets a specific, underserved need — multi-agent AI collaboration that produces an audit trail regulators or auditors can actually trust, not just a chat log.

Compared to AutoGen, LangGraph, or CrewAI — which focus on getting agents to coordinate — XYZZY's differentiator is the compliance layer: immutable, hash-chained event sourcing and an evidence ontology that ties every output back to its source, which matters a lot more in regulated or research environments than in a typical startup's internal tooling. The tradeoff is that this governance layer adds real complexity: you're running a Python/FastAPI service, thinking about SQLite-vs-Redis scaling, and learning the evidence-ontology concepts, none of which are needed if you just want agents to get a task done fast. For compliance-heavy teams that need to prove how an AI-assisted decision was reached, XYZZY is worth the setup cost; for quick prototyping or a small team without audit requirements, a lighter framework like CrewAI will get you moving faster.

💰 Pricing

Open SourceGratuit, licence Apache 2.0, auto-hébergé
Self-hosted gratuit

📊 Global score

53Average
🌐Availability15/100Faible

1 language · 0 platform

📄Profile90/100Excellent

Profile completeness

🤖 AI-enriched data

💰 Pricing model
💳 Open Source

Gratuit, licence Apache 2.0, auto-hébergé (SQLite par défaut, Redis optionnel pour la montée en charge).

👥 Target audienceÉquipes techniques, organismes de recherche, entreprises soumises à des exigences d'audit, environnements de décision IA collaborative, secteurs fortement réglementés.
🗣️ Languagesen
🌍 Target countriesMarché anglophone, écosystème open source international
👍

Pros

Pistes d'audit immuables idéales pour la conformité et les exigences réglementaires

Vraie coordination multi-agents avec portes d'approbation humaine

Entièrement auto-hébergeable, aucune dépendance externe requise

Riche ontologie de preuves reliant décisions et résultats

👎

Cons

Backend Python/FastAPI qui peut demander une charge DevOps au déploiement

Courbe d'apprentissage sur les concepts d'ontologie de preuves et de gouvernance

Écosystème plus restreint que les frameworks LLM grand public

SQLite par défaut, à surveiller pour les grandes équipes

❓ Frequently asked questions

What is XYZZY in one sentence?
How much does it cost?
Do I need my own AI models to run it?
What makes the audit trail 'tamper-evident'?
Is it worth the money compared to alternatives?
Which tool should you pick for your case?