Peec AI
Shows marketing teams how ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini talk about their brand versus competitors, with data you can export straight into your own dashboards.
🔗 Visit Peec AI
Description
Marketing teams have spent a decade building dashboards around Google rankings — Peec AI is trying to do the same thing for the AI-answer era, but built from the start to plug into how marketing teams already work rather than as a standalone silo. You set up prompts relevant to your brand (with AI suggestions based on real search volume to help you pick good ones), and Peec tracks how ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini respond to them over time, including what they cite as sources and how you compare to named competitors.
What distinguishes Peec from some competitors is its emphasis on getting the data out: everything exports to CSV, Looker Studio, or via API, and it recently added an MCP integration so the data can feed directly into AI agent workflows. It also covers some of the newer AI surfaces — Google AI Mode, AI Overviews, and Microsoft Copilot — alongside the core three engines. Peec is used by 3,000+ organizations and holds a 4.9/5 rating on G2, among the highest in this category, and it explicitly positions itself against Ahrefs, Semrush, and Profound as the AI-search equivalent of what those tools do for traditional search.
💬 Our review
The short version: Peec AI has the strongest third-party rating (4.9/5 on G2) of any tool in this AI-visibility comparison and a clear focus on exportability, but its refusal to publish concrete pricing makes it hard to compare on cost without booking a call.
Unlike Otterly, Rankscale, or Profound — all of which publish specific dollar amounts per tier — Peec only names its tiers (Starter, Pro, Advanced, Enterprise) without prices, which is a friction point if you're trying to budget before talking to sales. That said, its explicit positioning against Ahrefs and Semrush (rather than only against other AI-visibility startups) suggests it's aiming to be a primary analytics tool, not just an add-on, and the Looker Studio and API export options back that up — genuinely useful if your team already lives in Google's BI stack. The 4.9/5 G2 rating from presumably a reasonable review volume is a strong signal of real user satisfaction, on par with or above Otterly's 4.8/5. If transparent, comparable pricing matters to you, start with Otterly or Rankscale; if you want the best-reviewed option and don't mind a sales conversation to get pricing, Peec is worth that call.
💰 Pricing
📊 Global score
🤖 AI-enriched data
Four tiers (Starter, Pro, Advanced, Enterprise), billed annually; exact prices not published, requires signup/demo to see. Free trial available.
Pros
Highest third-party rating in this comparison (4.9/5 on G2)
Strong export options: CSV, Looker Studio, API, and MCP integration
Covers newer surfaces like Google AI Mode and Microsoft Copilot
Positions itself directly against established SEO tools like Ahrefs/Semrush
Cons
No published pricing — must sign up or request a demo to see tiers
Fewer AI engines covered than Rankscale's 17+
Harder to comparison-shop against tools with transparent pricing
Free trial exists but scope/duration not stated publicly