KIME
Kime is an agentic platform that tracks, benchmarks, and optimizes how brands appear in AI search engines like ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Claude.
🔗 Visit KIME
Description
These days, plenty of people skip Google entirely and just ask ChatGPT, Perplexity, or Gemini a question — including questions about which brand or product to buy. The problem is, a company has no real idea what the AI is actually saying about them in that moment: is it recommending them, ignoring them, or mixing up their product with a competitor's? Kime is a tool built to answer exactly that. It constantly checks what popular AI assistants say about a brand, tracks how that changes over time, and even takes automated steps to try to improve it.
Technically, Kime bills itself as an "agentic operating system for AI Search." It runs recurring prompts against ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Claude to measure brand visibility and sentiment, then benchmarks results against named competitors. Its Agentic Workforce Execution (AWX) layer goes beyond a passive dashboard: it can autonomously trigger optimization tasks rather than just flagging problems. An AI Web Health check scores how ready a website is to be understood and cited by AI crawlers, and country-level tracking lets multi-market brands compare visibility by region. It connects to other AI agents via MCP and exposes a full API. Pricing is tiered by tracked prompts and engines: Explorer at $99/month (50 prompts, 2 engines) and Core at $399/month (200 prompts, 3 engines), both with a 7-day free trial, plus a custom Enterprise plan for larger organizations.
💬 Our review
The short version: Kime does one clear job well — it tells you how AI chatbots talk about your brand — but you're paying premium prices to track a habit that's still forming, in a market where a dozen lookalike tools launched the same year.
Kime sits in the same "AI visibility" rush as Profound, Otterly, and a wave of 2026 entrants, all racing to become the "Ahrefs for AI search." Compared to Ahrefs or Semrush, which Kime itself cites as reference points, it isn't a replacement — those tools still own traditional SEO and keyword data, while Kime is narrowly focused on generative-engine answers. The AWX automation and AI Web Health audit are genuine differentiators if they work as advertised, and MCP connectivity is a smart bet on where AI tooling is heading. The catch is pricing: $99-$399/month buys a fairly small prompt allowance (50-200), so costs scale fast for brands wanting broad coverage, and there's no permanent free tier beyond the 7-day trial. Worth trialing given how new the category is, but expect competitors to converge on similar features within the year.
💰 Pricing
📊 Global score
🤖 AI-enriched data
Explorer à 99 $/mois (50 prompts, 2 moteurs IA), Core à 399 $/mois (200 prompts, 3 moteurs IA), Enterprise sur devis. Essai gratuit de 7 jours sur les plans Explorer et Core.
Pros
Suivi multi-moteurs IA (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude) dans une seule interface
Automatisation agentique (AWX) qui exécute des actions d'optimisation, pas seulement du reporting
Diagnostic « AI Web Health » pour évaluer la compatibilité du site avec les moteurs IA
Accès API complet et connectivité MCP pour s'intégrer à d'autres agents IA
Suivi géographique par pays pour les marques multi-marchés
Cons
Catégorie encore jeune et très encombrée en 2026 (nombreux outils similaires apparus la même année)
Tarification au volume de prompts suivis (50 à 200) qui peut vite devenir chère pour les grandes marques
Pas de plan gratuit permanent, seulement un essai de 7 jours