Murmell

Murmell

A shared cloud canvas where multiple AI coding agents (Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode) work on the same project at once, without overwriting each other's files.

🔗 Visit Murmell
📁 Editors, IDEs & Dev Tools🗣️ English📅 August 23, 2026

Description

If you've ever tried running more than one AI coding assistant on the same project at the same time, you already know the problem: they trip over each other, overwrite each other's changes, and you end up more confused than when you started. Murmell fixes that by giving every AI agent its own window on one shared, always-on cloud machine — like a shared whiteboard where each agent claims the files it's working on, so nothing gets clobbered, and you (and your teammates) can watch it all happen live in the browser.

Under the hood, Murmell spins up a cloud sandbox with a private GitHub repo, then lets you launch multiple agent windows — each running a real terminal with your agent of choice (Claude Code, Codex, Kimi, OpenCode) — inside one shared canvas. A file-reservation system prevents two agents from writing the same file simultaneously, sessions can be shared via a link so teammates see the same canvas in real time, and machines sleep when idle so you're not paying for runtime you don't use.

💬 Our review

The short version: if you're already juggling two or three AI coding agents on the same codebase by hand — separate terminals, separate branches, hoping nobody steps on anyone's toes — Murmell turns that chaos into one coordinated view, at a real subscription cost ($39-$149/month) rather than free.

Against running Cursor or Replit's built-in agent solo, Murmell's whole pitch is coordination at scale: it's built for multiple agents and multiple people on one project, not a single assistant helping one developer. That's a genuinely different use case — most teams don't need five agents editing one repo simultaneously, which makes Murmell a niche fit: multi-agent power users, agencies running parallel workstreams, or teams experimenting with agent orchestration. If you just want one good AI pair programmer, Cursor or GitHub Copilot Workspace stay cheaper and simpler. The 7-day free trial and file-locking mechanism are the two most concrete reasons to try it before assuming you need it. <!-- ai-generated -->

💰 Pricing

Payant (essai 7 jours)Essai gratuit 7 jours sur tous les plans, facturation mensuelle
Solo $39/mois — 1 agent, 1 projet, 5 fenêtresPro $69/mois — 10 agents, 3 projets, canvas partageable, $60 crédit OpusBuilder $149/mois — 20 agents, 100 projets, 25 personnes, $60 crédit Opus

📊 Global score

53Average
🌐Availability15/100Faible

1 language · 0 platform

📄Profile90/100Excellent

Profile completeness

🤖 AI-enriched data

💰 Pricing model
🆓 Payant (essai 7 jours, pas de plan gratuit permanent)

Solo $39/mois ; Pro $69/mois ; Builder $149/mois — tous avec essai 7 jours

👥 Target audienceÉquipes dev et power users qui font tourner plusieurs agents IA de code en parallèle sur un même projet
🗣️ Languagesen
🌍 Target countriesInternational
👍

Pros

Coordination multi-agents sans conflits de fichiers

Canvas partageable en temps réel

Compatible avec vos propres clés API d'agents

👎

Cons

Pas de plan gratuit permanent

Cas d'usage niche (un seul agent suffit à la plupart des devs)

❓ Frequently asked questions

What is Murmell in one sentence?
Is Murmell free?
Which AI coding agents does Murmell support?
Can my team watch or join an agent session live?
Do I need to worry about agents overwriting each other's code?
Is it worth the money compared to alternatives?
Which tool should you pick for your case?