Eye-Able

Eye-Able

A digital-accessibility platform used by 20,000+ websites (including Red Bull and UEFA) that combines automated scanning, an AI assistant that explains and fixes errors, and real human audits to get a site compliant with WCAG and the EU's accessibility la

🔗 Visit Eye-Able
📁 SaaS & Productivity🗣️ English📅 August 22, 2026

Description

Accessibility compliance has a credibility problem: an automated scanner alone can flag maybe a third of real issues, but hiring a full manual audit team is out of reach for most organizations, so plenty of sites end up with neither and inherit real legal risk once regulations like the EU's European Accessibility Act take effect. Eye-Able's pitch is to combine both approaches — automated scanning plus real manual review by people with disabilities — instead of forcing a choice between 'covers everything, superficially' and 'thorough, but too expensive to run.'

The platform includes an automated audit/testing engine, an Assist Widget with 25+ assistive features for end users, an 'Ally' AI assistant that explains detected errors and suggests code fixes, PDF accessibility optimization, plain-language rewriting and automated translation, and an accessibility-statement generator, alongside guided manual testing and ongoing monitoring. Founded in Europe by Oliver Greiner, Chris Schmidt and Tobias Greiner, it's BSI-certified and reports serving 20,000+ websites, including Red Bull, UEFA, Panini and Tchibo. Pricing isn't public — the site offers a 14-day free trial and custom quotes via consultation.

💬 Our review

The short version: Eye-Able's differentiator against pure-automation tools like accessiBe or UserWay is the manual-audit layer done by people who actually have disabilities, which is a real credibility advantage — automated overlays alone have a documented reputation problem in the accessibility community for papering over issues rather than fixing them.

The named customer list (Red Bull, UEFA, Panini, Tchibo) and BSI certification are hard to fake and suggest this holds up under real enterprise procurement scrutiny, not just marketing claims. The catch is pricing opacity: with nothing public beyond a 14-day trial, you can't compare cost against accessiBe or UserWay without going through a sales conversation, which is a real friction point for a smaller organization just trying to get a ballpark number. For an enterprise or public-sector organization in Europe that needs to show genuine remediation work (not just an overlay widget) ahead of accessibility-law deadlines, Eye-Able's combined automated-plus-human approach is worth the sales call; a small site with a tight budget that mainly needs a quick compliance checkbox may find a self-serve automated-only tool faster to get pricing on.

💰 Pricing

Sur devisEssai gratuit 14 jours ; tarifs communiqués après consultation commerciale.

📊 Global score

60Good
🌐Availability30/100Faible

2 languages · 0 platform

📄Profile90/100Excellent

Profile completeness

🤖 AI-enriched data

💰 Pricing model
💳 Sur devis

Pas de grille tarifaire publique. Essai gratuit de 14 jours, puis devis personnalisé après consultation commerciale.

👥 Target audienceGrandes entreprises, secteur public et organisations européennes soumises aux obligations d'accessibilité numérique (WCAG, EAA)
🗣️ Languagesende
🌍 Target countriesEurope (+ Worldwide)
👍

Pros

Combine scan automatique ET audit manuel par des personnes en situation de handicap

Certifié BSI, clients entreprise vérifiables (Red Bull, UEFA, Panini, Tchibo)

Assistant IA (Ally) qui explique les erreurs et propose des correctifs de code

Couvre aussi le PDF, la traduction et le langage simplifié

👎

Cons

Tarification totalement opaque, obligatoire de passer par un appel commercial

Positionnement clairement entreprise, moins adapté à un petit budget

Pas de tarif self-service comme accessiBe/UserWay

Focus européen fort, moins de repères hors UE

❓ Frequently asked questions

What is Eye-Able in one sentence?
How much does it cost?
How is it different from an accessibility overlay like accessiBe?
Does it cover PDFs, not just websites?
Who uses it?
Is it worth the money compared to alternatives?
Which tool should you pick for your case?