TinyFish

TinyFish

Enterprise web infrastructure for AI agents — search, fetch, and browser automation APIs used by Google, DoorDash, and other large companies.

🔗 Visit TinyFish
📁 AI & Machine Learning🗣️ English📅 August 22, 2026

Description

An AI agent that needs to browse a website, fill out a form, or pull data from a page most people can't do that reliably — pages block bots, layouts change, and logins get in the way. TinyFish builds the plumbing so agents can actually navigate the web the way a person would.

TinyFish is a web infrastructure platform for AI agents, offering four APIs: Search (real browser-rendered web search returning structured JSON), Fetch (converts pages to clean markdown/JSON/HTML), Agent (multi-step web automation including form-filling and authenticated flows), and Browser (cloud-hosted browser sessions with stealth anti-bot capabilities). The company has raised $47 million and counts Google, DoorDash, ClassPass, Amazon, and Grubhub among its users, running hundreds of thousands of agents monthly.

💬 Our review

The short version: TinyFish is solid, proven infrastructure if you're building AI agents that need reliable web interaction at real scale — but it's built and priced for companies with production workloads, not a weekend side project.

Against Selenium, Playwright, or Browserless — general browser-automation tools you self-host and maintain — TinyFish's pitch is managed reliability at scale: stealth browser profiles that bypass anti-bot protection, a claimed 89.9% accuracy on industry benchmarks, and enterprise customers like Google and DoorDash already running hundreds of thousands of agents through it monthly. That's a different tier of proof than most competitors in this space can show. The free Search and Fetch APIs are a genuinely low-risk way to try it before committing to the paid Agent ($0.016/step) and Browser ($0.002/minute) tiers. The trade-off is that pay-per-use pricing can add up fast at real agent volume, and the whole product is enterprise-oriented — an indie developer building a small side project will find Playwright or Apify cheaper and simpler for light use. Best fit: teams building production AI agents that need reliable, anti-bot-resistant web access at scale. Weaker fit: hobbyists or small side projects where a free, self-hosted tool like Playwright is more cost-effective.

💰 Pricing

Pay-per-useSearch/Fetch gratuits ; Agent 0,016$/étape ; Browser 0,002$/minute ; 8$ de crédits offerts.
Search/Fetch GratuitAgent 0,016 $/étapeBrowser 0,002 $/minute

📊 Global score

53Average
🌐Availability15/100Faible

1 language · 0 platform

📄Profile90/100Excellent

Profile completeness

🤖 AI-enriched data

💰 Pricing model
💳 Pay-per-use (metering)

Search et Fetch APIs gratuites. Agent API : 0,016 $/étape. Browser API : 0,002 $/minute. 8 $ de crédits offerts aux nouveaux comptes. Pas d'abonnement ni d'engagement minimum.

👥 Target audienceDéveloppeurs et équipes construisant des agents IA nécessitant une interaction web fiable et structurée à l'échelle
🗣️ Languagesen
🌍 Target countriesMarché anglophone / mondial, clients entreprise (Google, DoorDash, ClassPass, Amazon, Grubhub)
👍

Pros

89,9% de précision sur benchmarks du secteur

APIs Search et Fetch gratuites

Intégration MCP avec Claude et autres outils IA

Profils navigateur furtifs contournant l'anti-bot

Adoption entreprise prouvée (Google, DoorDash...)

👎

Cons

Coûts pay-per-use pouvant s'accumuler à l'échelle

Gestion de clé API et de portefeuille requise

Limité à l'automatisation web (pas d'apps desktop)

Tarification orientée entreprise, moins adaptée aux devs indie

❓ Frequently asked questions

What is TinyFish in one sentence?
How much does TinyFish cost?
Who uses TinyFish?
Does TinyFish handle anti-bot protection?
Does TinyFish integrate with Claude or other AI tools?
Is it worth the money compared to alternatives?
Which tool should you pick for your case?