VisibilityRadar
Checks whether ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and other AI models actually mention your brand when someone asks them for a recommendation — the new version of "do I rank on Google."
🔗 Visit VisibilityRadar
Description
More people are now asking an AI chatbot "what's the best tool for X" instead of typing it into Google — and if that chatbot never mentions your brand, no amount of traditional SEO fixes it. VisibilityRadar was built around that shift: it checks, brand by brand, whether the major AI models actually recommend you when it matters.
VisibilityRadar is an AI-visibility monitoring platform that tests whether large language models — Claude, GPT-4o, Gemini, Perplexity, Grok, and DeepSeek — mention a given brand in their responses, and scores customer trust and "AI readiness" alongside it. It includes an "AI Focus Group" feature that simulates up to 10 customer personas to surface conversion blockers, competitor benchmarking, model-specific playbooks for improving visibility on each AI platform, and an MCP API for programmatic access to the same data.
💬 Our review
The short version: if you already track SEO rankings and are wondering whether AI chatbots recommend you at all, VisibilityRadar answers that specific question — the free Starter tier is enough to get a first read before paying anything.
This is a genuinely new category — traditional tools like Semrush or Brand24 track search rankings and social mentions, not what an LLM says when asked directly, so VisibilityRadar isn't really competing head-to-head with them yet. The free tier (1 analysis, 2 models) is a real, if narrow, way to test the concept before paying. The Pro tier at $49/month for 10 analyses across all 6 models is reasonable for an ongoing check, but the jump to Agency at $599/month is steep if you just need occasional visibility snapshots for a handful of brands. Because this space is so new, it's also worth treating any single score as directional rather than gospel — LLM outputs vary run to run, and "AI visibility" as a discipline is still being defined. Best fit: marketing teams at brands with real competitive stakes in AI-assisted purchase decisions (SaaS, consumer products) who want a repeatable way to track this. Weaker fit: a team that just wants classic SEO/rank tracking — that's still Semrush's job.
💰 Pricing
📊 Global score
🤖 AI-enriched data
Gratuit : 1 analyse, 2 modèles IA. Pro : 49 $/mois (tarif de lancement, -50% vs 99 $). Agency : 599 $/mois, analyses illimitées.
Pros
Catégorie nouvelle et en pleine croissance : suivi de la visibilité de marque DANS les réponses IA, pas juste le SEO classique
Couvre 6 modèles majeurs (Claude, GPT-4o, Gemini, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek)
Palier gratuit suffisant pour tester le concept avant de payer
Focus Group IA simule jusqu'à 10 personas clients pour identifier les blocages
Cons
Discipline encore jeune — les réponses des LLM varient d'une exécution à l'autre, un score isolé doit être pris avec prudence
Écart de prix important entre Pro (49 $) et Agency (599 $) sans palier intermédiaire
Ne remplace pas un outil de suivi SEO classique (Semrush reste nécessaire pour ça)
Catégorie encore émergente, moins de recul sur la fiabilité long terme des scores