this+that
An AI layer over Gmail, Slack, Teams and Outlook that reads your team's messages, pulls out the action items, and keeps a shared "Brain" of what's going on — built for teams too small to have a dedicated ops person.
🔗 Visit this+that
Description
Small, fast-growing teams tend to hit the same wall: work is scattered across email, Slack, and a dozen half-followed-up threads, and nobody has the bandwidth to be the person who chases every loose end. this+that is built specifically for that gap — a company too small for a dedicated operations hire, but big enough that things are starting to fall through the cracks.
this+that is an AI agent platform that centralizes communication across Gmail, Outlook, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Google Chat and Telegram, then automatically extracts action items from what's said and routes them into workflows. It maintains a shared "Brain" — a running knowledge base of what the team knows and has decided — and offers a unified inbox ("DoBox") for triaging everything in one place instead of switching between apps. It ships with 18 built-in MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers and supports connecting custom ones, so it can plug into more specialized internal tools beyond the default integrations.
💬 Our review
The short version: this+that is worth trying for free right now if your team is drowning in scattered follow-ups across email and chat — the real test will be whether it's still worth $29-35/user/month once the beta pricing ends.
Its positioning against Zapier, Make, and n8n is different: those are trigger-based automation tools you configure once, while this+that is closer to an always-on AI ops layer that reads your actual conversations and surfaces what needs doing, without you writing a single "if this, then that" rule. That's a genuinely useful shape for a small team, but it also means the product's value depends entirely on how well its AI reads context correctly — a bad extraction (assigning the wrong action item, missing an urgent thread) is worse than no automation at all, and it's hard to judge that reliability from marketing copy alone. It's currently free during beta with no credit card required, which makes it low-risk to trial now, but budget for ~$29-35/user/month once that ends, and reassess whether it's still earning its keep at that price for your team size. Best fit: small teams (5-30 people) without a dedicated ops hire, drowning in cross-channel follow-ups. Weaker fit: teams that already have solid habits and tooling (a well-run project board, disciplined Slack channels) — the AI layer adds cost without solving a real pain point there.
💰 Pricing
📊 Global score
🤖 AI-enriched data
Gratuit pendant la bêta, sans carte bancaire. Plan payant prévu ~35 $/utilisateur/mois (29 $/mois si facturé annuellement). Enterprise sur devis.
Pros
Centralise Gmail, Outlook, Slack, Teams, Google Chat et Telegram en un seul endroit
Extraction automatique des actions à faire depuis les conversations réelles, pas de règles à configurer
"Brain" partagé : base de connaissance vivante de l'équipe
18 serveurs MCP intégrés + connexion de serveurs personnalisés
Cons
Gratuit seulement pendant la bêta — le vrai test de valeur arrive au passage à ~29-35 $/utilisateur/mois
Fiabilité de l'extraction IA difficile à juger sans essai réel — une erreur d'attribution coûte plus cher qu'aucune automatisation
Produit jeune, positionnement encore en rodage face à des mastodontes établis (Zapier, Make)
Peu d'intérêt pour une équipe déjà bien organisée sur ses outils existants