Dowe
Write your app once and get real native versions for the web, desktop, iOS, and Android out of it — actual SwiftUI and Jetpack Compose, not a web view pretending to be a native app.
🔗 Visit Dowe
Description
Building the same product for web, iOS, and Android usually means either maintaining three separate native codebases, or accepting the compromises of a cross-platform framework that renders everything inside a web view dressed up to look native. Dowe takes a third path: one source graph that generates genuinely native output for each target — real SwiftUI on iOS, real Jetpack Compose on Android, server-side rendering plus route assets for the web, and native window output for desktop.
Instead of an open node_modules-style package ecosystem, capabilities come through what Dowe calls "checked contracts," and the framework composes routes, layouts, pages, sections, grids, state, and handlers within those contracts rather than allowing arbitrary JavaScript packages. It installs via a one-line curl script on macOS/Linux or a PowerShell command on Windows. Pricing isn't published on the site.
💬 Our review
The short version: "one codebase, real native output everywhere" is the promise most cross-platform frameworks make but don't fully deliver on — React Native and Flutter get close on mobile but web views persist in some cross-platform tools — so Dowe's claim of generating actual native SwiftUI and Jetpack Compose (not embedded web views) is the part worth verifying hands-on before committing a project to it.
Against React Native or Flutter, which have years of ecosystem maturity, community packages, and battle-testing, Dowe's "checked contracts instead of node_modules" approach trades that broad package ecosystem for tighter guarantees about consistency across targets — a deliberate constraint, not an oversight, but one that limits what you can pull in versus an npm-based framework. Against building native apps separately for each platform, Dowe's one-codebase pitch saves real duplicated engineering effort if the generated native output holds up in production. As a new, unpriced tool, it's best evaluated on a small pilot project before betting a serious product on it.
💰 Pricing
📊 Global score
🤖 AI-enriched data
Tarification non publiée sur le site
Pros
Génère du SwiftUI et Jetpack Compose réellement natifs, pas des web views
Une seule base de code pour serveur, web, desktop, iOS et Android
Installation simple en une commande
Cons
Écosystème de paquets limité (contrats vérifiés plutôt que node_modules ouvert)
Moins éprouvé que React Native ou Flutter
Tarification non publiée