ServiceRadar

ServiceRadar

A free, open-source tool for watching over network infrastructure spread across remote or hard-to-reach sites — think branch offices, edge locations or restricted networks — where you can't just install a normal monitoring agent everywhere.

🔗 Visit ServiceRadar
📁 Monitoring & Observability🗣️ English📅 July 29, 2026

Description

Standard monitoring tools usually assume your servers all live in one reachable network with wide-open access to a central dashboard. That assumption breaks down for companies with lots of small remote sites, air-gapped or segmented networks, or edge hardware — which is exactly the gap ServiceRadar is built to fill, discovering and monitoring services and devices even in constrained, change-controlled environments without needing broad access into the core network.

It's a fully open-source (Apache 2.0) platform combining network discovery and inventory, NetFlow analytics, edge telemetry, endpoint software tracking, and even the ability to run Ansible/AWX automation against the systems it monitors. Under the hood it speaks a long list of observability protocols (OTEL, GELF, Syslog, SNMP, BGP, NetFlow), maps network topology in a GPU-accelerated real-time engine that can render millions of nodes, includes a WASM plugin system for writing custom checks in Go or Rust, and uses a "causal engine" to help pinpoint root causes and isolate the blast radius of an incident quickly. It's built on a modern stack (Go agents, Elixir/Phoenix backend, TimescaleDB, NATS JetStream) and a hosted cloud version is coming, alongside the always-free self-hosted option.

💬 Our review

The short version: if your monitoring headache is specifically about remote, segmented or edge networks that regular tools can't reach — not general-purpose app/server monitoring — ServiceRadar is a purpose-built, free option worth trying before reaching for something heavier.

For general infrastructure monitoring, tools like Datadog or Grafana-based stacks are more mature and broadly used, but ServiceRadar's specific angle — zero-trust discovery in constrained networks, NetFlow analytics, and a WASM plugin system for custom checks — targets a narrower, real pain point that those generalist tools don't optimize for. Being fully open source and Apache 2.0 licensed means there's no license cost at all for the self-hosted version, which is a meaningful advantage over commercial network-monitoring suites that charge per device or per data volume; the tradeoff, as with any self-hosted observability stack, is that you're running the Go/Elixir/TimescaleDB/NATS stack yourself until the hosted cloud tier ships. Worth evaluating specifically if you manage infrastructure across many remote or restricted sites.

💰 Pricing

Gratuit / open sourceAuto-hébergé gratuit, cloud hébergé à venir
Self-hosted $0Cloud (coming soon) TBD

📊 Global score

45Average
🌐Availability15/100Faible

1 language · 0 platform

📄Profile75/100Bien

Profile completeness

🤖 AI-enriched data

💰 Pricing model
🆓 Gratuit, open source

Auto-hébergé gratuit (Apache 2.0). Version cloud hébergée annoncée (Standard et Enterprise), tarifs pas encore publiés.

👥 Target audienceÉquipes gérant des infrastructures distribuées, sites distants, environnements réseau segmentés ou edge
🗣️ Languagesen
🌍 Target countriesInternational
👍

Pros

100% open source (Apache 2.0), gratuit en auto-hébergement

Conçu spécifiquement pour réseaux distants/segmentés/edge

Supporte de nombreux protocoles (OTEL, SNMP, NetFlow, BGP, Syslog)

Système de plugins WASM pour checks personnalisés en Go/Rust

👎

Cons

Version cloud hébergée pas encore disponible ("coming soon")

Niche spécifique (réseaux distants) plutôt que monitoring généraliste

Nécessite de gérer soi-même une stack Go/Elixir/TimescaleDB/NATS

❓ Frequently asked questions

What is ServiceRadar in one sentence?
How much does it cost?
Is this for general server monitoring like Datadog?
Can I write my own custom checks?
Is it worth the money compared to alternatives?
Which tool should you pick for your case?