Viktor
An AI 'employee' you add to Slack or Microsoft Teams that actually does the task instead of just answering questions — building a dashboard, writing code, or reconciling data on its own.
🔗 Visit Viktor
Description
Most chatbots you add to Slack just answer questions or summarize a channel. Viktor is built to go further: you ask it to do something — write a report, build a small dashboard, reconcile two spreadsheets, even write code and open a pull request — and it actually does the work in the background, in an isolated workspace, then reports back when it's done or needs your approval.
Viktor connects to 3,200+ tools (Stripe, HubSpot, Google Ads, Meta Ads, PostHog, Linear, Notion, GitHub, Google Calendar and more), runs in an isolated cloud workspace with persistent memory across tasks, and is now live in both Slack and Microsoft Teams — reaching 30,000+ companies and 320M+ Teams users. It offers a free tier with $100 in usage credits and no credit card required, with paid plans starting at $50/month. It's SOC 2 Type 1 compliant (Type 2 in progress) with data encrypted in transit and at rest, and claims setup in minutes rather than the days typical of enterprise automation rollouts.
💬 Our review
The short version: Viktor's pitch — an AI that executes tasks across your existing tools rather than just chatting about them — is a step beyond typical Slack bots, and the free tier with real usage credits makes it cheap to actually test that claim yourself.
Compared to no-code automation builders like Zapier or Make, which need you to wire up each step yourself, Viktor is meant to take a plain-language instruction and figure out the steps, which is faster to start but harder to audit — you're trusting the agent's judgment more than a visual workflow you built by hand. Against a dedicated AI coworker platform bundled into an existing suite (e.g. Microsoft Copilot for Teams-only shops), Viktor's advantage is breadth of integrations (3,200+) and working in both Slack and Teams, though a newer, single-purpose platform inherently carries more operational risk than a giant incumbent's bundled feature. For a small team wanting to try 'agentic' automation without committing to a full automation platform build-out, the free credits make it low-risk to find out if it delivers.
💰 Pricing
📊 Global score
🤖 AI-enriched data
Gratuit avec 100$ de crédits d'usage (sans CB), payant à partir de 50$/mois
Pros
Exécute réellement la tâche (code, dashboards, rapports), pas juste des réponses
3200+ intégrations (Stripe, HubSpot, GitHub, Notion, etc.)
Disponible dans Slack et Microsoft Teams (30 000+ entreprises, 320M+ utilisateurs Teams)
Essai gratuit avec 100$ de crédits, sans carte bancaire
SOC 2 Type 1 (Type 2 en cours)
Cons
Moins auditable qu'un workflow no-code construit à la main (Zapier/Make)
Jeune plateforme comparée aux suites bundlées type Microsoft Copilot
Dépend de la qualité de compréhension de l'instruction en langage naturel