Tolmo
An AI security platform that runs autonomous agents across code, cloud, and CI/CD to find vulnerabilities, test whether they're actually exploitable, and ship the fix — instead of adding another alert to a queue no one clears.
🔗 Visit Tolmo
Description
Security teams already drown in vulnerability alerts, most of which turn out to be theoretical or already mitigated by some other control — the real bottleneck isn't finding issues, it's knowing which ones matter and fixing them fast enough. Tolmo's autonomous security agents build a live knowledge graph of a company's code, cloud, and vendor relationships, then actually test whether a flagged vulnerability is exploitable in that specific environment before anyone spends time on it.
Instead of surfacing an isolated alert the way a traditional scanner does, Tolmo's agents work across the whole production stack — code, infrastructure, CI/CD pipelines, and third-party security vendors — and can ship the fix once exploitability is confirmed, not just flag the problem. Pricing isn't public; access goes through a demo request, which is standard for security tooling sold to teams whose environment size and risk profile varies widely enough that a fixed price sheet wouldn't be meaningful. It's aimed at security teams and CTOs who want to cut remediation time from weeks to minutes while keeping the tool read-only until a fix is confirmed safe to ship.
💬 Our review
The short version: Tolmo's real differentiator is exploitability testing — it doesn't just tell you a CVE exists somewhere in your stack, it checks whether that specific vulnerability is actually reachable and dangerous in your environment, which is the step most vulnerability scanners skip and most security teams don't have time to do manually.
The lack of public pricing and demo-gated access means there's more sales friction before you can evaluate it hands-on compared to a self-serve tool, which matters if you're comparing options quickly. The read-only-until-confirmed-safe posture is a reasonable middle ground between full autonomy and a human-in-the-loop review, but it does mean the 'ships the fix automatically' pitch still involves a verification step before code changes land. For a security team buried in false-positive alerts from traditional scanners, cutting through to only exploitable, real threats is worth the extra sales-call friction.
💰 Pricing
📊 Global score
🤖 AI-enriched data
Accès via demande de démo, pas de grille tarifaire publique.
Pros
Teste l'exploitabilité réelle plutôt que de signaler des alertes théoriques
Graphe de connaissances en direct couvrant code, cloud, CI/CD et vendors
Peut livrer directement le correctif une fois l'exploitabilité confirmée
Rôles en lecture seule jusqu'à confirmation, réduisant le risque d'action automatisée hasardeuse
Cons
Tarification non publique, accès via démo uniquement
Plus de friction commerciale avant de pouvoir tester
La livraison automatique du correctif reste soumise à vérification, pas totalement autonome