LaunchLogs
It watches what you actually coded today and writes the 'here's what I shipped' post for you, so building in public stops depending on you remembering to write one.
🔗 Visit LaunchLogsDescription
Sharing daily progress is one of the most recommended ways to build an audience while building a product, but it quietly dies for most people after a week or two because writing a good update every single day is its own chore on top of the actual coding. LaunchLogs removes that chore: it connects to your GitHub repositories, reads your commits, and turns them into a clean, human-readable summary of what you built that day — ready to post as-is.
From there it handles the distribution too: one-click publishing to X and LinkedIn, a public profile page showing your streak and progress calendar, and support for tracking multiple repositories at once, useful for people juggling more than one side project. The free tier requires no credit card, and a paid tier exists for people who want more, though its exact price isn't published on the marketing site.
💬 Our review
The short version: if you already write code every day but keep failing to post about it consistently, LaunchLogs removes the one step that actually breaks the habit — writing the update itself.
Compared to doing it manually (which is free but relies entirely on your own discipline) or to generic scheduling tools like Buffer or Typefully that still need you to write the content, LaunchLogs' edge is that the content is generated directly from your commit history, so there's nothing to compose. The catch is it only knows what happened in your GitHub repo — it can't capture non-code progress like sales calls or design decisions, and the paid tier's price isn't disclosed upfront, which is a minor trust gap for a tool asking for GitHub access. For commit-heavy solo builders trying to stay visible without a writing habit, it's a genuinely useful shortcut.
💰 Pricing
📊 Global score
🤖 AI-enriched data
Palier gratuit sans carte bancaire ; palier payant existant mais montant non publié sur le site
Pros
Génère le post à partir des commits GitHub réels, rien à rédiger
Publication en un clic sur X et LinkedIn
Suivi de séries (streak) et calendrier de progression public
Supporte plusieurs dépôts pour les makers multi-projets
Cons
Ne capture que le travail visible dans les commits GitHub, pas le reste (ventes, design, discussions client)
Prix du palier payant non publié
Nécessite d'accorder l'accès à ses dépôts GitHub
Moins utile pour un travail non technique
