Vigolium

Vigolium

A security scanner that doesn't just flag possible bugs like most tools — it tries to actually exploit them first, so you only see the ones that are real.

🔗 Visit Vigolium
📁 Security & Privacy🗣️ English

Description

Most vulnerability scanners are famous for crying wolf: they flag hundreds of "possible" issues, and a security engineer spends half their week figuring out which ones are actually exploitable versus noise. Vigolium takes a different approach — it combines a traditional deterministic scanner with an AI agent that tries to genuinely exploit each finding, generating working proof-of-concept code, so what lands in your inbox is a validated bug with evidence, not a guess.

Vigolium ships 317 scanner modules covering content discovery, browser-based spidering (including single-page apps), and active/passive auditing for issues like XSS, SQL injection, CSRF, IDOR, SSRF and GraphQL vulnerabilities. Its "olium" agent runtime can run autonomous scanning modes — Autopilot, Swarm, and Audit — that plan attacks, write custom JavaScript extensions on the fly, and cross-reference source code for context, supporting frameworks like Spring Boot, Django, Laravel, Rails, Express and Next.js, plus enterprise platforms like Salesforce and ServiceNow. It's fully open source under AGPL-3.0 (self-hostable, free, 909+ GitHub stars), with a hosted Cloud Console available as a paid SaaS option starting at $29 per 100K lines scanned, and works with OpenAI, Anthropic, Google Vertex, Ollama or OpenRouter as the underlying LLM.

💬 Our review

The short version: Vigolium is for a security or dev team that's drowning in false positives from traditional scanners and wants a tool that proves a bug is real before wasting anyone's time on it.

The validated-exploit approach is the genuinely differentiating idea here — most competitors (Burp Suite, OWASP ZAP) are pattern-matchers that leave triage entirely to a human, while Vigolium's agent runtime tries to actually pop the vulnerability and hands you the proof. Being open source and self-hostable under AGPL-3.0 also removes the usual objection to running a security scanner against sensitive code: you're not sending anything to a third party unless you choose the Cloud Console. The honest caveats: AI-driven auditing means results depend partly on which LLM you point it at, and while 909 GitHub stars and documented scans across 67+ real projects is a decent track record for a 2026 launch, it's not the decade of hardening that Burp Suite or ZAP have behind them — pair it with a mature scanner rather than replacing one outright if you're securing something critical. Pricing is also unusually granular (per-100K-lines) which rewards small, well-scoped codebases and can get expensive fast on a sprawling monorepo.

💰 Pricing

Open-source + pay-per-useSelf-hosted gratuit sous AGPL-3.0. Cloud Console dès $29/100K lignes, pack de départ $299, entreprise sur devis.
Self-hosted Gratuit (open source)On-Demand Scan $29 / 100K lignesStarter Pack Dès $299 (5000 crédits)Enterprise Sur devis

📊 Global score

53Average
🌐Availability15/100Faible

1 language · 0 platform

📄Profile90/100Excellent

Profile completeness

🤖 AI-enriched data

💰 Pricing model
🆓 Open-source gratuit + SaaS payant à l'usage

Auto-hébergé : gratuit (AGPL-3.0). Cloud Console : à partir de $29 par 100K lignes de code scannées ; pack de départ dès $299 (5000 crédits) ; tarif entreprise sur devis.

👥 Target audienceÉquipes sécurité et développement de toute taille — du MVP solo aux organisations avec des dizaines de millions de lignes de code
🗣️ Languagesen
🌍 Target countriesWorldwide
👍

Pros

Exploits validés avec preuve de concept, pas juste des alertes brutes

Open source AGPL-3.0, auto-hébergeable pour du code sensible

317 modules de scan + agent IA autonome (Autopilot, Swarm, Audit)

Compatible multi-LLM (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google Vertex, Ollama, OpenRouter)

👎

Cons

Tarification SaaS au volume de lignes, peut grimper vite sur un gros monorepo

Produit jeune comparé à Burp Suite ou ZAP (décennies de maturité)

Qualité des résultats IA dépend du LLM choisi

Nécessite une config OAST/LLM pour exploiter pleinement les capacités IA

❓ Frequently asked questions

What makes Vigolium different from a typical vulnerability scanner?
Can I self-host it for free?
What kind of vulnerabilities does it detect?
Do I need my own AI/LLM subscription to use it?
Is it worth the money compared to alternatives?
Which tool should you pick for your case?