EasyBilling
Billing infrastructure aimed specifically at AI companies that need to charge by the token, the API call, or a mix of both — pitched as the thing you buy instead of spending six to eighteen months building it yourself.
🔗 Visit EasyBilling
Description
AI companies have a billing problem that traditional SaaS tools weren't built for: charging for tokens consumed, API calls made, or GPU time used, often blended with a subscription base — and building that in-house is a real engineering project, not a quick integration. EasyBilling's pitch, quoting the line "even OpenAI doesn't build its own billing system," is that this is infrastructure worth buying rather than building.
EasyBilling handles subscription, usage, token-based and hybrid billing configuration, real-time usage metering with automated invoicing, multi-currency billing with intelligent payment routing, tax compliance automation (VAT, GST) via Stripe Tax/TaxJar/Avalara integrations, and account lifecycle management (plan changes, proration, refunds), with payment support through Stripe, PayerMax, Alipay and WeChat Pay. It publishes live metrics on its homepage ($284.5K MRR, $3.4M ARR, 1,240 active accounts) and offers a free plan with no credit card required, positioning in-house billing development at 6-18 months and $200K-$500K+ as the alternative cost.
💬 Our review
The short version: EasyBilling's specific focus on AI-company billing (tokens, API calls, GPU time) and its transparent live-metrics display ($284.5K MRR shown on the homepage) give it a credibility signal that most billing startups don't bother with — you can see it's a real, growing business rather than just a landing page.
Against Solvimon or Metronome, which are built for broader usage-based billing at enterprise scale, EasyBilling reads as the more accessible, AI-startup-first option: a free plan with no credit card, explicit token/credit billing support, and payment rails (Alipay, WeChat Pay, PayerMax) that matter if your AI product has a global or APAC-leaning customer base neither Solvimon nor Metronome emphasizes as clearly. At $3.4M ARR and 1,240 accounts, it's smaller and less proven than Metronome (now owned by Stripe, powering OpenAI) or Solvimon (ex-Adyen team), so the trade is accessibility and specific AI-billing focus versus enterprise track record. Worth it for an early-stage AI company that wants token/usage billing without an enterprise sales process; the more established players are the safer bet once you're at serious scale.
💰 Pricing
📊 Global score
🤖 AI-enriched data
Plan gratuit disponible sans carte bancaire. Paliers payants non détaillés publiquement, à consulter sur la page /pricing.
Pros
Spécifiquement pensé pour la facturation de tokens/usage IA
Métriques d'activité publiques et vérifiables ($284,5K MRR, 1240 comptes actifs)
Plan gratuit sans carte bancaire pour démarrer
Moyens de paiement globaux incluant Alipay et WeChat Pay, utile pour une clientèle APAC
Cons
Beaucoup plus petit et moins éprouvé que Metronome (clients OpenAI) ou Solvimon (équipe ex-Adyen)
Détail des paliers payants peu visible sur la page d'accueil
Moins de profondeur enterprise (SLA, gouvernance) que les concurrents plus établis
$3,4M ARR reste modeste comparé aux acteurs plus matures de la catégorie