BrowserAct
A remote-controlled, disguised web browser for AI agents — it lets an AI click around real websites like a person instead of getting blocked by "prove you're not a robot" checks, and can teach itself to repeat the task next time.
🔗 Visit BrowserAct
Description
Websites are built for humans clicking a mouse, which is exactly why an AI agent trying to use one often gets stopped cold by CAPTCHAs, login walls, or pages that look different every visit. BrowserAct is built to get an AI agent past that wall: a browser it controls that disguises itself as a normal human visitor, solves CAPTCHAs, and adapts when a page's layout changes.
BrowserAct is a browser-automation platform purpose-built for AI agents, combining a stealth browser engine (fingerprint, network, and session isolation to avoid bot-detection) with adaptive agents that can rebuild a scraper when a site's layout shifts, plus a human-in-the-loop remote-assist handoff for cases the AI can't resolve alone. It's built by ECOCREATE TECHNOLOGY PTE. LTD. (Singapore), open-sources two of its agent "Skills" (browser-act and browser-act-skill-forge) on GitHub, and integrates with Claude, Cursor, Codex, and no-code tools like Zapier, Make, and n8n. Billing runs on a pay-as-you-go credit system with no fixed subscription tiers — a 7-day free trial is available, but exact monthly cost depends heavily on which components (stealth browser, proxy bandwidth, workflow steps) a given task uses.
💬 Our review
The short version: if your AI agent keeps getting blocked, CAPTCHA'd, or fed stale scraped data by ordinary browser automation, BrowserAct is solving that specific, real problem — but its credit-based pricing is complex enough that you should run the numbers on your actual workload before committing, not just eyeball the per-unit rates.
Compared to open-source browser-automation tools like Playwright or Puppeteer wrapped in your own anti-detection logic, BrowserAct sells the stealth/anti-detection layer as a maintained service instead of a DIY project — a real time-saver if bypassing bot detection isn't your core competency. Compared to a more general agent-browsing tool, its 99%+ CAPTCHA-solving claim and G2/AppSumo ratings (4.6/5, 4.4/5) are vendor-reported and unverified, so treat them as directionally positive rather than guaranteed. The credit system (separate meters for the stealth browser, proxy bandwidth by the GB, and workflow steps) genuinely requires a calculator to estimate real monthly cost — budget for that friction before rolling it into a production pipeline.
💰 Pricing
📊 Global score
🤖 AI-enriched data
Système de crédits à l'usage (facturation mensuelle ou annuelle, -20% en annuel) ; essai gratuit de 7 jours ; pas de palier fixe — coût réel dépend du navigateur furtif, de la bande passante proxy et du nombre d'étapes de workflow utilisés
Pros
Navigateur furtif avec isolation empreinte/réseau/session anti-détection
Résolution de CAPTCHA et agents adaptatifs face aux changements de mise en page
Intégrations Claude, Cursor, Codex, Zapier, Make, n8n
Deux Skills open source publiées sur GitHub
Cons
Facturation à crédits complexe — coût réel difficile à estimer sans calculateur
Taux de succès CAPTCHA (99%+) et notes G2/AppSumo non vérifiés indépendamment
Aucune info sur fondateurs, financement ou date de lancement