Mokka
AI recruiting platform that sources, screens and pre-interviews candidates while specifically detecting AI-generated or fraudulent applications.
🔗 Visit Mokka
Description
As AI tools make it easy for job applicants to auto-generate polished resumes and even fake video-interview answers, recruiters have a newer problem on top of the old one: not just "who's qualified" but "is this application even genuine." Mokka is an AI recruiting platform built with that specific problem in mind — alongside sourcing and screening candidates automatically, it actively checks whether an application shows signs of being AI-generated or fraudulent before a recruiter wastes time on it.
Mokka's three-agent system covers sourcing (from 850M+ profiles across 250+ job boards), screening and evaluation (with explainable, auditable scoring), and AI-conducted pre-interviews via voice, text or video, layered with fraud/integrity detection to catch AI-generated responses. It integrates with 100+ ATS systems, and prices per-candidate rather than per-seat: roughly $0.49 per direct-applicant screening and $1.99 per pre-interview, with sourced candidates screened free, plus a $500-3,000 per-job sourcing fee.
💬 Our review
The short version: Mokka's specific bet — that AI-generated fake job applications are now a real enough problem that recruiting software needs to actively detect them — is a genuinely fresh angle in a crowded AI-recruiting market that mostly still competes on plain sourcing/screening speed.
The per-candidate pricing model (roughly $0.49-$1.99 per applicant rather than a flat per-seat SaaS fee) is worth noting on its own: it scales naturally with hiring volume rather than penalizing a company for adding recruiter seats, which is friendlier for a lean team than most competitors' seat-based pricing. Explainable, auditable scoring (rather than an opaque AI ranking) also matters increasingly for compliance, especially under regulations like the EU AI Act that the vendor explicitly claims compliance with. The honest caveat: it's a newer, smaller platform than hireEZ, so its ATS integration breadth (100+ claimed) and Fortune 500 proof points are less independently established — a good fit for a company specifically worried about candidate-side AI fraud or wanting per-candidate pricing, less proven yet at the largest enterprise scale that hireEZ has already demonstrated.
💰 Pricing
📊 Global score
🤖 AI-enriched data
Per-candidate pricing: ~$0.49/direct applicant screened, ~$1.99/pre-interview (free for sourced candidates); AI sourcing $500-$3,000/job. 30-day free trial on Starter/Business tiers.
Pros
Actively detects AI-generated/fraudulent candidate applications, a fresh angle in this market
Per-candidate pricing scales naturally with hiring volume, not per-seat
Explainable, auditable AI scoring for compliance (SOC 2, GDPR, EU AI Act)
Three-agent system covers sourcing, screening, and pre-interviews in one platform
Cons
Newer, smaller platform than hireEZ, less proven at largest-enterprise scale
ATS integration breadth (100+ claimed) less independently established